The ERC-funded project RESOLVENCY explores possibilities of rethinking debt as a more sustainable social medium for the democratic deliberation of corporate, consumer and sovereign debt relations. To this end, RESOLVENCY proposes to govern debt from its limits. Through this shift from an “insolvency” to a “re-solvency” paradigm, the project aims to reveal the regulatory potential of insolvency law as a structure for collective action.
If money makes the world go 'round, then debt speeds it up. But what is debt? Debt and credit are social bonds that enable extended reciprocity over time, forming a logical pair of formalized exchanges. A creditor gives something to a debtor, who owes the creditor and promises to give something back later. Essentially, debt gives the debtor time—normally calculated in money—to pay back what they owe. With regular interest rates, debt buys time.
Legally, both parties (creditor and debtor) enter into a binding contract. If the object of the contract is money, then the bond is called debt. From an analytical point of view, all time-delayed transactions are credits or debts. Money is the central medium for exchanging, measuring, and recording debt and transactions. Money itself is a form of credit, promising collective and public acceptance in the future. Stock markets, cryptocurrencies, and decentralized finance add private collective credit systems. Debt-based reconstructions apply to all forms of capital circulation, such as investing in land, material resources, or funds in an economic endeavor to generate future profits. In capitalism, the primary economic medium is debt, which operates under the binary code of "to pay or not to pay." The term "liquidity" then enters to classify different types of debt, money, and capital. One of the project's subliminal objectives is to outline the basic legal mechanisms that constitute collective credit systems.
Credits serve as investments in growth for all economic actors, including firms, consumers, and states. Current growth is financed by debt, which is repaid based on future growth. Debt is a core element of perpetual growth, which threatens sustainable development. Debt bubbles cause financial and economic instability, as evidenced by the global financial crisis of 2008. The natural limits to growth on our planet, such as climate change, are not reflected in the economic sphere. Nor are the rising distributional inequalities around the globe and within nearly every national society. Democratic governance and actors’ autonomy both suffer from the structural power of heavy economic debt. In short, an unlimited, reductionist financial conception of debt drives economic, ecological, cultural, and political unsustainability. Decoupled financial markets (e.g., derivative trading), imperialistic debt politics, and massive public and private debt (e.g., in response to a pandemic-driven recession) further perpetuate the global debt cycle.
Research Project
RESOLVENCY – A Global Theory of Reflexive Debt (Deliberation)
Project Lead
Prof. Dr. Bertram Lomfeld, Freie Universität Berlin
bertram.lomfeld@fu-berlin.de
Funding
European Research Council (ERC)
Grant Agreement No. 950427
The RESOLVENCY project rethinks debt governance in terms of its limits, i.e., debt default. Consider a debtor who appears to be over-indebted or illiquid. In that case, all creditors will try to be the first to collect on their debt. A rush for cash can destroy any remaining potential of the debtor and weaken economic trust in general. Insolvency law is the legal solution to this collective action problem. It freezes credit relations and offers collective procedures for debt restructuring or asset distribution. However, insolvency law does much more. It ranks creditor positions according to debt priorities (e.g., depending on collateral) and may discharge the debtor. These "insolvency factors" ultimately determine the value of assets as secure, alienable capital. Most lawyers and economists view insolvency law as a technical tool that overcomes the race of creditors for cash. The RESOLVENCY project aims to reveal insolvency law's full potential to regulate and constitute debt markets. In this respect, the project shifts from an insolvency paradigm to a "resolvency" one. "Resolvency" indicates the reintegration of overburdened debtors, the resilience of social debt relations, and the reentry of social, political, cultural, and ecological perspectives into collective credit systems.
If credit does not lead to the expected growth, social conflicts emerge. Resolving debt conflicts requires the consent of creditors regarding the distribution of remaining assets, as well as a collective procedure that considers the interests of debtors and all other private and public parties involved, including employees, inhabitants, communities, and the environment. The project attempts to model various legal structures for democratic debt deliberation procedures, which will be evaluated in economic, game-theoretical experiments. Substantively, the project aims to outline a measure or index for sustainable debt combined with models on how to incentivize it by reshaping insolvency factors. Some causal assumptions about this interrelation and the ex-ante effects on credit markets will be tested in experiments again. The ultimate goal is to develop a theory of reflexive debt (RE:DEBT), which links social reentries in collective restructuring procedures with more sustainable capital coding.